logo
News
Reviews
Blogs
Search articles
6 mins read
Understanding the Environmental Footprint: The CO2 Emission Comparison between EVs and Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) Vehicles
Shayma Shamim
Share this article
blog description image
Published on 23rd Jul 23
Like
5 views

Understanding the Environmental Footprint: The CO2 Emission Comparison between EVs and Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) Vehicles 

Currently, automakers and consumers are faced with a choice between pure electric vehicles (EVs) and internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEs). Both types of vehicles have their pros and cons and it's important to understand the differences to make an informed decision.

The most obvious difference between EVs and ICEs is the powertrain. While EVs are powered by an electric motor, ICEs use an internal combustion engine that burns gasoline or diesel fuel. This difference has an impact on the environmental impact, operation, and maintenance of the vehicles.

Another big difference is the range. EVs typically have less range per charge compared to ICEs, which means they need to be charged more often. This difference can be a disadvantage for people who regularly drive long distances. However, it should be noted that EVs have made great strides in range in recent years, and there are now models that can travel hundreds of miles on a single charge.

Fuel economy is another important difference. EVs do not require fuel and are therefore much cheaper to run than ICEs. This can result in significant savings in running costs, especially when the electricity comes from renewable energy sources. ICEs, on the other hand, remain dependent on fossil fuels, which can come with rising prices and environmental impacts.

A final difference is maintenance. EVs typically have fewer moving parts than ICEs, meaning they're less prone to wear and breakdown. This can result in lower maintenance costs and extend the life of the vehicle. ICEs, on the other hand, require regular oil changes, filter changes, and maintenance to function optimally.

Overall, there are many differences between pure electric vehicles and vehicles with internal combustion engines. EVs are greener, have a shorter range, and are less expensive to operate and maintain. ICEs, on the other hand, offer a greater range and an established infrastructure. When deciding between the two types of vehicles, consumers must consider their individual needs, habits, and priorities.

Environmental Friendliness Of Electric Vehicles

Sustainable Energy Source

A major advantage of pure electric vehicles is their environmentally friendly energy source. Unlike internal combustion engine vehicles that use fossil fuels such as gasoline or diesel, electric vehicles use electrical energy from renewable sources such as solar power, wind power, or hydroelectric power. This helps to reduce CO2 emissions and fight climate change.

Lower Carbon Footprint

Electric vehicles have a significantly lower carbon footprint compared to internal combustion engine vehicles. On the one hand, this is because they do not produce any harmful emissions during vehicle operation. On the other hand, electric vehicles that are charged with renewable energy can have a much lower greenhouse gas balance over the entire life cycle. This aspect makes electric vehicles an environmentally friendly alternative.

Less Air Pollution

Because electric vehicles produce no exhaust fumes, they help reduce air pollution in cities. Emissions of particulate matter and harmful gases such as nitrogen oxides are significantly reduced, resulting in better air quality. This can help to improve the health of the population and reduce respiratory diseases, especially in metropolitan areas.

Resource Conservation

The production of electric vehicles requires fewer raw materials than the production of conventional vehicles with internal combustion engines. Since no large engine, exhaust system, or fuel tank is required, fewer metals and other materials are required. In addition, the use of lightweight materials such as aluminum or carbon fiber allows for more efficient use of available resources.

blog?

Comparison

Vehicles with internal combustion engines, as used in most conventional cars, use fossil fuels as a source of energy. These fossil fuels are derived from natural resources such as oil, natural gas, and coal and are non-renewable energy resources. When these fossil fuels are burned in a vehicle's engine, they produce energy that propels the vehicle. This process typically occurs through the controlled combustion of gasoline or diesel fuel in an internal combustion engine.

The main disadvantage of using fossil fuels is that they lead to the release of carbon dioxide (CO2) during combustion. CO2 is a greenhouse gas that contributes to global warming and amplifies climate change. The use of fossil fuel internal combustion engines also has negative effects on air quality. The combustion of petrol and diesel produces harmful exhaust gases such as nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), and particulate matter. These pollutants can lead to air pollution and health problems.

Direct Emission

Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) Vehicles

As a consequence of burning fossil fuels (such as petrol or diesel), Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) cars release carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gases straight through their tailpipes. The type of gasoline used and the vehicle's fuel efficiency both affect how much CO2 is released.

Electric Vehicle

Since electric motors and batteries are used to power them, electric vehicles (EVs) don't emit any pollution at the exhaust. The emissions are, however, transferred to the stage of electricity generation, which is based on the energy mix of the grid used to charge the EV.

Well-to-wheel emissions

Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) Vehicles

Emissions from ICE cars' tailpipes and those associated with the extraction, refinement, and transportation of fossil fuels are included in their CO2 emissions.

Electric Vehicle

The CO2 emissions of EVs include emissions from the manufacturing of the car, the production of the batteries, and the power.

Cradle-to-grave emissions

Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) Vehicles

The creation of EV batteries results in greater emissions throughout the process of making them. The initial carbon footprint is influenced by the extraction and processing of raw materials used in batteries, such as nickel, cobalt, and lithium. However, efforts are ongoing to lessen the impact of battery manufacture via research and development in battery technology and recycling techniques. Since EVs don't have tailpipe emissions, they emit less pollution when in operation. They are powered by electricity and the carbon footprint they produce while in use is determined by the energy sources utilized to produce that electricity. The operating emissions may be almost minimal if the power is generated from renewable or low-carbon sources. However, if the electricity comes from fossil fuel-based power plants, the operational emissions will be higher but still typically lower than ICE vehicles. End-of-life emissions for EVs primarily result from the disposal and recycling of batteries and other vehicle components. Recycling efforts are improving to minimize the environmental impact of end-of-life processes.

Electric Vehicle

When operating, ICE cars release CO2 and other greenhouse gases straight from their tailpipes. The fuel economy of the car and the fuel type (gasoline or diesel) utilized to determine how much emissions are produced. Throughout the lifespan of ICE vehicles, additional emissions are produced during the extraction, refinement, and transportation of fossil fuels (such as petrol and diesel). ICE cars, like EVs, produce emissions at the end of their useful lives, mostly from the recycling and disposal of their parts and materials.
 

Comments
No comments added yet
Post a comment
You may also like
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
© 2023 Kazam EV Tech Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.